The New Top 100

4 short podcasts. After a Youth Shield fiasco, here’s what’s changing in Top 100 and why it should mean less admin, fairer tournaments and more fun for everyone.


Youth Cup fixture arrangements: rules clarification

By David Marsden · Hamburger SV

Yesterday’s Youth Shield round exposed two separate problems, and it is worth being clear about both of them.

First, the new Tournament Centre was harder for some managers to navigate than it should have been. I accept responsibility for that. Based on the feedback, the tournament site has already been changed to make the schedule much easier to find, and My Matches now gives managers a simple personalised view of who they are playing and whether they should send the friendly request or expect one.

Second, one part of the published Youth Cup rules had become out of date. The old wording told an away manager who had not received a friendly request to contact the home manager 24 hours before kick-off. That was written when Soccer Manager allowed friendlies to be arranged much later. Changes to the game now mean that Wednesday can be the last opportunity to arrange a Saturday friendly.

The rules have therefore been clarified for future rounds.

Fixtures will normally be published by Sunday evening. The home manager should send the Soccer Manager friendly request promptly and no later than Wednesday. The away manager must also check the fixture and, if no request has arrived, contact the home manager before Wednesday’s arranging window closes. If either manager encounters a problem, they should tell the organiser while there is still time to resolve it.

The responsibility remains shared, but that does not mean the two jobs are identical. The home manager initiates the fixture; the away manager checks that it has happened and chases if it has not. Where there is a dispute, evidence of a timely request, message or attempt to resolve the problem can distinguish the manager who made a reasonable effort from the manager who did not. If neither manager makes a reasonable effort, both can forfeit.

Tournament reminders and newsfeed posts are useful back-ups, but they do not replace managers’ responsibility to find their fixture and arrange it in time.

This clarification takes effect from 13 September 2026. It does not retrospectively reopen the S28 Youth Shield Round of 32 decisions from 12 September. Those decisions were made under the rules and circumstances applying to that round.

The change is recorded in the Top 100 rulebook and in the full Youth Cup rules rather than silently replacing the old position. That matters: when the platform changes, our procedures sometimes have to change with it, but we should always be able to establish which rule applied at the time.

The practical version for managers is very simple: check My Matches on Sunday, send or chase the request, and don’t leave it until the end of the week.


Top 100 has moved

The Top 100 website is transitioning from WordPress to Micro.blog, preserving its history while simplifying the contribution process for managers.


Regen Then & Now: Three Seasons Later

Updated after the completion of Season 3.

When Top 100 Regen launched, its hierarchy came from the real world.

The 100 clubs were allocated to five divisions using Opta rankings. Real Madrid began at the summit; clubs such as Maccabi Haifa and New England Revolution started deep in Division 5.

At the start of S3 we took our first proper look at how much that world had already changed.

Now Season 3 is complete — including the play-offs — we can go one step further.

The answer is: a lot.

By the numbers

At launch, the combined value of all 100 squads was approximately £12.71 billion.

By the end of S3 it was around £16.70 billion.

That’s an increase of almost £4 billion — roughly 31%.

The average squad rating has risen from 85.26 to 88.04.

Of the 100 clubs:

  • ⭐ 73 have a higher average squad rating than at launch
  • ➡️ 17 are unchanged
  • ⬇️ Only 10 are rated lower

And once S3’s promotions and relegations are applied to the S4 line-up:

  • 🔼 25 clubs will be above their original S1 division
  • 🔽 29 will be below it
  • ➡️ 46 remain in the same tier

More than half the Game World will therefore begin S4 somewhere other than the division in which Opta originally placed them.

One important caveat: the rules changed too

Not all of the increase in squad strength and value should be treated as pure manager-driven growth.

The Game World’s rules have evolved.

In S1 we operated a 30-player split squad cap:

  • maximum 19 first-team players
  • minimum 11 youth players

For S3 this was replaced by a simple 40-player overall squad cap.

That gives clubs considerably more freedom to retain senior players, prospects and transferable assets simultaneously. It naturally contributes to higher total squad values and, potentially, higher squad-average ratings.

The transfer rules changed too.

In S1 and S2, the maximum cash component of a transfer was £99 million.

For S3 we reduced that to £50 million.

That is why the S1 and S2 record-transfer lists contain walls of £99m deals while S3 contains numerous £50m transfers — often supplemented by players in exchange.

So the numbers below reflect both manager decisions and an evolving ruleset.

The pyramid is getting flatter

The most striking change isn’t at the top.

It’s underneath it.

Average squad ratings among the teams which finished S3 in each division were approximately:

Division S1 starting average End-S3 average
Division 1 89.90 90.10
Division 2 86.75 88.30
Division 3 84.45 87.65
Division 4 83.90 87.30
Division 5 81.30 86.85

The average D1 squad is only fractionally stronger than it was when the Game World began.

The average D5 squad is more than five rating points stronger.

At launch there was roughly an 8.6-point gap between the average D1 and D5 squads.

By the end of S3, that gap was only around 3.25 points.

The ranges overlap enormously:

D1: 88–92
D2: 86–91
D3: 85–89
D4: 86–89
D5: 85–88

A strong Division 5 squad can now have the same average rating as a weaker Division 1 squad.

That simply wasn’t true when Regen began.

The great squad rebuilds

Some of the most dramatic transformations have happened at clubs which began near the bottom.

Club S1 rating End S3 Change
Derby County 76 88 +12
Royal Antwerp 76 87 +11
Sparta Praha 76 86 +10
Maccabi Haifa 78 87 +9
FC København 77 86 +9
RSC Anderlecht 79 87 +8
Ajax 80 88 +8
New England Revolution 79 87 +8

Derby are the most extreme example.

They began as a 76-rated D5 club worth only £36.6m.

By the end of S3 their squad was rated 88 and worth approximately £142.5m.

And after two seasons of building without escaping Division 5, they finally finished third in S3 and won automatic promotion.

Royal Antwerp tell a similar story: from a 76-rated £37.9m squad to an 87-rated side worth roughly £154.7m, followed by promotion through the D5 play-offs.

Maccabi Haifa have gone from 78 and £31.6m to 87 and roughly £144.7m.

Mamelodi Sundowns started at 81 and £44.2m. By the end of S3 they were rated 88, worth around £147.5m, and heading for Division 3.

The bottom of the pyramid isn’t what it used to be.

Value isn’t everything

There is an important qualification.

Building an expensive, highly rated squad doesn’t automatically make you successful.

Sparta Praha are perhaps the perfect example.

Their squad has risen from 76 to 86, one of the biggest improvements anywhere in the Game World, yet they finished only 13th in Division 5.

For much of the season Royal Antwerp had the same problem: enormous squad growth without corresponding league progress, before finally winning promotion through the play-offs.

Union Berlin made huge early investments and built an 87-rated squad — yet finished bottom of D5.

That’s encouraging.

If trading success simply converted mechanically into league position, there wouldn’t be much of a game.

The clubs who have rewritten their place in the world

The most spectacular transformation isn’t financial.

It’s geographical.

Real Sociedad: D4 → D1

Real Sociedad began in Division 4.

Then:

S1: D4 champions
S2: D3 runners-up
S3: 3rd in D2

They will start S4 in Division 1.

Three seasons, three consecutive promotions.

Girona: D5 → D2

Girona began all the way down in Division 5.

S1: promoted via play-offs
S2: promoted from D4
S3: D3 play-off winners

They will begin S4 in Division 2.

Again: three seasons, three promotions.

Al Nassr: back-to-back champions

Al Nassr finished only 10th in D5 in S1.

Then they won Division 5 in S2.

And Division 4 in S3.

They will play in Division 3 next season.

Mamelodi Sundowns: 11th in D5 to D3

Mamelodi’s progression has been less immediate but just as striking:

S1: 11th in D5
S2: 3rd in D5
S3: 2nd in D4

They too begin S4 in Division 3.

New England Revolution: D5 → D3

New England were one of the lowest-ranked clubs when the Game World launched.

They finished second in D5 in S1, won Division 4 in S2 and consolidated with ninth place in D3 this season.

They have established themselves two full divisions above their starting point.

Upward mobility

Twenty-five clubs will begin S4 above the division in which they started:

Club S1 S4
Real Sociedad D4 D1
Girona FC D5 D2
Tottenham Hotspur D2 D1
Villarreal CF D2 D1
Brentford D2 D1
Manchester United D2 D1
Eintracht Frankfurt D3 D2
FC Porto D3 D2
ACF Fiorentina D3 D2
SC Freiburg D4 D2
Ajax D4 D2
Galatasaray SK D3 D2
New England Revolution D5 D3
Al Nassr FC D5 D3
Mamelodi Sundowns D5 D3
River Plate D4 D3
Palmeiras D4 D3
Valencia CF D4 D3
CR Flamengo D4 D3
Atlético Mineiro D5 D4
Maccabi Haifa D5 D4
RSC Anderlecht D5 D4
UD Las Palmas D5 D4
Derby County D5 D4
Royal Antwerp D5 D4

Sociedad and Girona are obviously the headline acts, but the breadth of movement matters just as much.

And some have gone the other way

Twenty-nine clubs will start S4 below their original level.

There are some enormous falls.

Club Brugge: D2 → D5
Olympiacos: D3 → D5
OGC Nice: D3 → D5
Feyenoord: D3 → D5

Elsewhere, Liverpool’s D1 → D2 fall lasted only one season before they returned as S3 champions, while Aston Villa have also fought their way back to D1 through the play-offs.

Atalanta and Brighton have become early Regen yo-yo clubs.

The pyramid isn’t simply producing upward mobility. It is producing churn.

A Game World with its own history

This may be the biggest change of all.

At the beginning, saying that Real Sociedad were a Division 4 club or Liverpool were a Division 1 club didn’t really tell us anything about their history in the Game World.

There wasn’t any history.

Those were simply the divisions an external ranking had assigned them.

That is no longer true.

Real Sociedad are a Division 1 club because they earned three promotions.

Girona are a Division 2 club because they climbed there from Division 5.

Liverpool are a Division 1 club because they were relegated and fought their way back.

Al Nassr are in Division 3 because they won consecutive titles.

Club Brugge are in Division 5 because they fell there.

The Opta seedings still echo through the Game World. Real Madrid, Bayern München and Manchester City remain among its strongest clubs.

But three seasons of transfers, promotions, relegations, play-offs, manager changes and rule changes have begun replacing that inherited hierarchy with one created inside the game itself.

Season 1 established the hierarchy.

Season 2 disrupted it.

Season 3 began to create a new one.

And that is probably the best sign yet that Regen is working.


Full club data

The full comparison table includes all 100 clubs, their original Opta ranking, S1 and S3 squad strength and value, divisional movement and manager changes.

Note: the embedded comparison sheet was created during S3 and some individual squad values have subsequently changed. The figures in this updated article use the end-of-S3 snapshot.


Season 3: Bayern Break the Real Madrid Run as City Complete a Cup Treble

Season 3 of Top 100 Regen is over — and three seasons in, this Game World has well and truly developed a history of its own.

Bayern München ended Real Madrid’s two-year hold on Division 1. Manchester City somehow managed to win three cups without winning the league. Liverpool bounced straight back from relegation. Real Sociedad completed an extraordinary three-season climb from Division 4 to Division 1. Al Nassr won a second consecutive divisional championship.

And Bayern weren’t finished there: their youngsters also won the Top 100 Youth Cup.

Here’s how S3 finished.

Bayern break the Madrid monopoly

The Division 1 title went all the way to the final night.

Bayern München and Real Madrid entered the last round level on 79 points, with Manchester City just two points behind. When it was over:

Pos Club Pts
🏆 1 Bayern München 82
2 Manchester City 80
3 Real Madrid 79
4 Paris Saint-Germain 73

Andrew Kelly’s Bayern München are the S3 champions, ending James Mckenzie’s run of consecutive titles with Real Madrid.

For Kelly it is a particularly impressive achievement: he won Division 2 with Villarreal in S1 and has now won Division 1 with Bayern.

At the bottom, Atalanta, Athletic Club, Brighton & Hove Albion and Lille OSC were relegated.

Atalanta and Brighton have already become genuine yo-yo clubs: both went D1 → D2 → D1 → D2 across the first three seasons.

Liverpool bounce straight back

Liverpool’s first ever relegation in S2 proved brief.

They dominated Division 2, finishing champions on 88 points, with Manchester United second on 77.

But perhaps the story of the whole Game World sits immediately behind them.

Pos Club Pts
🏆 1 Liverpool 88
2 Manchester United 77
3 Real Sociedad 76
4 Aston Villa 75

Real Sociedad’s third place completed a remarkable sequence:

S1: Division 4 champions
S2: Division 3 runners-up
S3: Division 2 third place

Three seasons. Three promotions.

A club originally placed in Division 4 by the Opta rankings will begin S4 in Division 1.

Aston Villa joined the promoted trio after beating Porto 1–0 in the play-off semi-final and Fiorentina 3–2 in the final.

Union Saint-Gilloise, Lazio, AC Milan and Slavia Praha were relegated.

Girona keep climbing

Division 3 produced another of Regen’s great journeys.

Bologna bounced straight back from relegation by winning the division on 84 points, just one ahead of Ajax. Galatasaray took the third automatic promotion place.

Pos Club Pts
🏆 1 Bologna FC 84
2 Ajax 83
3 Galatasaray SK 74
4 Girona FC 68

Ajax themselves have now climbed from their original D4 allocation into D2.

But Girona went one better.

They began the Game World in Division 5, won promotion in S1, climbed again in S2 and reached the S3 play-offs from fourth place.

A penalty shoot-out victory over Lyon put them into the final, where goals from Roberto Firmino and İlkay Gündoğan gave them a 2–1 win over Benfica.

So Girona’s journey now reads:

D5 → D4 → D3 → D2

Like Real Sociedad, they have been promoted in every season the Game World has existed.

Leeds United, Osasuna, Wolverhampton Wanderers and Mainz were relegated from D3.

Back-to-back titles for Al Nassr

Division 4 belonged to two clubs which started life in Division 5.

Al Nassr won the league with 89 points, following their S2 Division 5 title with another championship.

Jimmy Gouldie’s side have therefore gone:

S1: 10th in D5
S2: D5 champions
S3: D4 champions

Behind them, Mamelodi Sundowns finished second with 84 points and 94 goals, while Strasbourg claimed the third automatic promotion place.

Pos Club Pts
🏆 1 Al Nassr FC 89
2 Mamelodi Sundowns 84
3 RC Strasbourg Alsace 69
4 Maccabi Haifa 69

Sundowns’ own journey has been dramatic: 11th in D5 → 3rd in D5 → 2nd in D4. They will start S4 in Division 3.

The final promotion place went to Flamengo. They beat Maccabi Haifa in the semi-final before defeating Salzburg 2–1 in the final.

Fenerbahçe, Stade Rennais, Club Brugge and Olympiacos were relegated.

Derby finally escape Division 5

Las Palmas ran away with Division 5, finishing champions on 87 points.

Wolfsburg took second and Derby County third.

Pos Club Pts
🏆 1 UD Las Palmas 87
2 VfL Wolfsburg 74
3 Derby County 73
4 Getafe CF 71

Derby’s promotion is significant for another reason. They began S1 with a 76-rated squad and have since built one rated 88 — the biggest rating increase anywhere in the Game World.

For two seasons that squad-building hadn’t resulted in promotion. This time it did.

Royal Antwerp took the fourth promotion place after two nerve-shredding shoot-outs: first beating Getafe 2–0 on penalties, then drawing 1–1 with Como before winning the final shoot-out 4–1.

Antwerp also started with a 76-rated squad. They too will finally leave D5 behind.

Manchester City’s cup treble

Bayern won the league.

But if S3 had a cup king, there is no contest.

Paul Rimmer’s Manchester City won:

  • 🏆 Top 100 Regen Cup
  • 🏆 SMFA Champions Cup
  • 🏆 SMFA Super Cup

The Champions Cup final provided an appropriate finale to the season.

City faced the newly crowned D1 champions Bayern München in Luzhniki. Savinho put City ahead after 51 minutes before Baena equalised for Bayern on 62.

It finished 1–1.

In the shoot-out, Moraes saved Harry Kane’s opening penalty and Musiala later missed. City converted all four of theirs, Savinho scoring the decisive kick.

Manchester City 1–1 Bayern München
City win 4–1 on penalties.

Remarkably, it is City’s third consecutive SMFA Champions Cup. Paul Rimmer has won the competition in S1, S2 and S3.

City still haven’t won Division 1.

Football, eh?

Bournemouth take the SMFA Shield

The other international final produced five goals at Wembley.

Tottenham took the lead through Brennan Johnson, but Bournemouth responded through Antoine Semenyo and Justin Kluivert before Timothy Weah made it 3–1.

Vušković pulled one back late on, but Bournemouth held on.

AFC Bournemouth 3–2 Tottenham Hotspur

Simon Thomas therefore adds the SMFA Shield to Bournemouth’s Regen Shield triumph from S2.

Arsenal won this season’s Top 100 Regen Shield, while Internazionale took the Charity Shield.

Bayern’s youngsters do it too

Bayern’s senior side weren’t the club’s only S3 champions.

Pane Trifunov’s Youth Cup competition culminated with Bayern beating Arsenal 3–1 in the semi-final, while Liverpool defeated Internazionale 4–1 in the other semi.

The final was another five-goal game:

Bayern München 3–2 Liverpool

So Bayern finish S3 as both Division 1 champions and Youth Cup winners.

The full S3 honours

Competition Winner Manager
Division 1 Bayern München Andrew Kelly
Division 2 Liverpool yamil Mc02
Division 3 Bologna FC Armando Pierone
Division 4 Al Nassr FC Jimmy Gouldie
Division 5 UD Las Palmas daz hughes
Top 100 Regen Cup Manchester City Paul Rimmer
Top 100 Regen Shield Arsenal The FM
SMFA Champions Cup Manchester City Paul Rimmer
SMFA Shield AFC Bournemouth simon thomas
SMFA Super Cup Manchester City Paul Rimmer
Charity Shield Internazionale Bojan H
Division 2 Play-off Aston Villa Chris Baggio
Division 3 Play-off Girona FC Chris Taylor
Division 4 Play-off CR Flamengo Okeeno Grant
Division 5 Play-off Royal Antwerp Mohammed Ajmal
Top 100 Youth Cup Bayern München Andrew Kelly

A new hierarchy

When Top 100 Regen began, the five divisions were essentially an Opta ranking converted into a Game World.

Three seasons later, that description doesn’t really work any more.

Real Sociedad have travelled from D4 to D1. Girona have gone from D5 to D2. New England Revolution have risen from D5 to D3. Al Nassr have won consecutive divisions. Mamelodi Sundowns are heading from D5 into D3. Ajax have climbed from D4 to D2.

Meanwhile Liverpool have been relegated and returned. Atalanta and Brighton have gone down, up and down again. Club Brugge have fallen from D2 to D5.

The original hierarchy hasn’t disappeared.

But it has been thoroughly messed with.

Which was rather the point.


Introducing the Youth Cup Tournament App

The Top 100 Youth Cup now has its own dedicated tournament website:

Visit the new Youth Cup app

What began as an attempt to make the Youth Cup easier to organise has grown into something much more ambitious: a complete tournament platform for managers, organisers and spectators.

The new app brings fixtures, results, tables, knockout draws, rankings, disciplinary records and tournament history together in one place — while also giving every participating manager their own private portal.

And although it has launched with the Youth Cup, the longer-term plan is for it to become the home of future Top 100 competitions too.

A Dedicated Manager Portal

Every participating manager can now log in through the new “Manager Portal”.

From there, managers can see the matches they are responsible for arranging, submit fixture details, report results and keep track of their tournament commitments without having to search through WhatsApp messages or spreadsheets.

The portal is designed to make it immediately obvious:

  • which matches still need to be arranged;
  • which results are awaiting submission or confirmation;
  • what deadlines are approaching;
  • and whether there are any outstanding tournament actions.

This should make the Youth Cup much easier to run while reducing missed fixtures, duplicated messages and administrative detective work.

Tournament Summary

The “Tournament Summary” gives a quick overview of the current competition.

It brings together the key tournament numbers, including the number of participating teams, matches played, goals scored and the progress of the competition.

It is the quickest way to see where the tournament currently stands without having to navigate through every group and round.

Featured Matches

The “Featured Matches” section highlights some of the biggest or most interesting upcoming fixtures.

These might include heavyweight group matches, qualification deciders, knockout ties or matches with particular significance to the competition.

The aim is to make the tournament feel like an event rather than simply a list of results.

Featured matches can also be supported by previews, manager comments and press conference quotes.

Winners and Tournament Archive

The “Winners section” celebrates the clubs and managers who have won the Youth Cup and Youth Shield.

Past competitions can also be accessed through the tournament archive, creating a permanent historical record rather than allowing each season’s results to disappear into old posts, spreadsheets or Challonge brackets.

Over time, the archive will include:

  • tournament winners;
  • runners-up and losing semi-finalists;
  • group tables;
  • knockout results;
  • final rankings;
  • leading scorers and statistical records;
  • fair-play records;
  • and links to the original tournament coverage.

Group Tables

The “Groups section” contains every group table, fixture and result.

Tables update automatically as results are entered, including points, goal difference, goals scored and qualification positions.

This removes the need to calculate tables manually and makes it much easier for managers to understand exactly what they need from their remaining matches.

Knockout Fixtures

Once the group stage is complete, the “Knockout section” follows the competition through every round of the Youth Cup and Youth Shield.

Fixtures, aggregate scores and qualification status can all be viewed from the same page.

The app is also being built to support different knockout formats, including:

  • single-leg matches;
  • two-legged ties;
  • extra time;
  • penalties;
  • seeded draws;
  • and teams dropping from one competition into another.

That gives us much more flexibility when designing future tournaments.

There are no knockout fixtures to show, yet, of course - let’s just hope it all works when the time comes, haha!

Tournament Rankings

The “Rankings section” compares every participating team across the tournament.

Rather than only showing who remains in the competition, the rankings provide a complete picture of performance based on group results and knockout progress.

This means teams can still compete for the highest possible final ranking even after elimination — and it gives us a useful way to compare performances across different groups.

The rankings can also help shape future tournament seedings.

Fair Play

The “Fair Play section” records forfeits, unplayed matches and other tournament compliance issues.

This is not intended simply as a wall of shame. It gives managers a transparent record of whether fixtures were completed properly and allows tournament decisions to be applied consistently.

It will also make it easier to determine eligibility for future prize draws, awards or tournament invitations.

Over time, the fair-play system could develop into a broader manager reliability record, recognising the managers who consistently arrange and complete their matches on time.

Full Tournament Brackets

The “Brackets section” provides a visual overview of the knockout competition.

Managers can follow the route from the opening round to the final, see which teams could meet in later rounds and track both the Youth Cup and Youth Shield without leaving the site.

This replaces the need to rely on a separate external bracket service and means the complete tournament can now be managed and archived within the Top 100 platform.

Brackets will appear, as if by magic, when the group stage finishes, similar to the archived Challonge S27 Youth Cup above.

Press Conferences

One of the more entertaining additions is the introduction of tournament press conferences.

Managers can provide comments before or after matches, respond to questions, make predictions, praise their players, complain about referees, put pressure on their opponents or deliver the usual carefully rehearsed football clichés.

Selected quotes can then appear alongside featured matches and tournament coverage.

It gives managers another way to become involved in the competition and should help create some stories, rivalries and personality around the matches.

Built for More Than the Youth Cup

The Youth Cup is the first competition to use the new platform, but the underlying system is being designed to support a range of different Top 100 tournaments.

Future plans include hosting:

  • the World Club Cup;
  • future Regen tournaments;
  • new Youth Cup seasons;
  • one-off invitational tournaments;
  • and other community competitions.

Different tournaments will be able to use different numbers of teams, group formats, knockout structures, seeding systems and fixture rules.

The aim is not to build a single Youth Cup page. It is to create a reusable Top 100 tournament platform.

Tournament Registration

A future registration system will allow managers to enter upcoming competitions directly through the site.

Managers will be able to register their team and receive confirmation once they have been accepted.

Tournament organisers will then be able to review entries, remove duplicates and everyone will be able to see the list of participants before and after registrations close.

More Features Planned

Other ideas being considered include:

  • automatic fixture reminders;
  • tournament notifications;
  • manager and club tournament profiles;
  • head-to-head records;
  • live draw generation;
  • downloadable fixtures and calendar integration;
  • embedded match reports;
  • and a central page showing every active and upcoming Top 100 competition.

A Better Way to Run Top 100 Tournaments

The Youth Cup has always relied heavily on managers volunteering their time, arranging matches and reporting results.

The new app will not eliminate every missed deadline, forgotten fixture or confused manager. That would require considerably more advanced technology such as Top 100 AI-powered microchip implants.

But it should make the tournament clearer, easier to follow and much less labour-intensive to administer.

More importantly, it gives Top 100 tournaments a permanent home of their own.

Take a look around:

Explore the Youth Cup app

And managers taking part can access their fixtures and tournament tasks here:

Open the Manager Portal


If you would like to support the ongoing maintenance costs, and all the new development of the Top 100 website and app ecosystem, please consider donating.

You can give anything from a one-off £1 donation or set up a regular amount via Stripe.

If you don't want to, or can't afford to, that's also fine.


WORLD CLUB CUP S28

The countdown is over. A new World Club Cup season is on the horizon, and the road to the trophy has never looked more demanding.

Before the action begins, the spotlight remains on last season's champions Leicester and their manager Ash. The atmosphere is charged with anticipation as fans look forward to seeing how the team will build upon their incredible success from the previous season.

This season, we keep the same approach as last season, focusing on the World Club Cup as our primary competition. The format implemented has proven to be effective and smooth, allowing teams to face off under favorable conditions. Managers can organize their matches without encountering any significant logistical issues, which is crucial in maintaining the teams' competitive spirit and performance levels.

The objective is clear: fewer scheduling conflicts, which have plagued teams in the past, will lead to greater intensity in every match played. The league has carefully crafted a schedule that maximizes the excitement of the tournament while minimizing the risk of fatigue or injury among players. This relentless path toward the title means that every match counts, placing considerable pressure on all teams involved to consistently perform at their best. By fostering a competitive environment, fans can expect thrilling moments and intense rivalries to unfold throughout the season. The stakes have never been higher, and as the teams prepare to take the field, the excitement builds for what promises to be an unforgettable season.

DRAW COMPLETE – SURVIVAL FROM DAY ONE

The draw has been finalized, producing a full knockout bracket where there will be no second chances.

From the opening round, every match carries elimination stakes. Every tie will be played over two legs, placing a premium on consistency, squad management, and tactical discipline.

With 100 clubs participating, several teams have received automatic passage through Round 1. Tournament officials emphasized that these byes were assigned purely through random draw and are necessary to maintain bracket balance.

The competition officially kicks off on Wednesday, July 15th, when the first battles of the new campaign get underway.

Tournament Schedule and Bracket:
⚽️🍀🏆https://challonge.com/wvvpws2j🏆🍀⚽️

EXTRA TIME RULE REMAINS

Tournament regulations remain unchanged regarding tied aggregate scores.

Should teams finish level after two legs, progression will once again be decided through the established Fictional Extra Time system, ensuring every knockout clash produces a winner.

STRICTER RULES FOR MANAGERS

Organizers have also announced tougher standards regarding fixture organization following issues experienced during the previous seasons.

Managers will be expected to take full responsibility for arranging matches and maintaining communication with their opponents.

Should a fixture remain unplayed, managers must provide evidence that genuine attempts were made to organize the match. Failure to do so could have severe consequences.

If neither side can demonstrate sufficient effort, both clubs will be eliminated from the competition, while their scheduled next-round opponent will advance automatically.

The message from tournament officials is unmistakable: professionalism and accountability are now non-negotiable.

A NEW CHAPTER BEGINS

The bracket is set. The contenders are ready. The champions have targets on their backs.

For some clubs, this season offers redemption. For others, it presents an opportunity to build a legacy. For everyone involved, the challenge is the same: survive, advance, and keep the dream alive.

Same format. Greater pressure. Higher stakes.

The World Club Cup is back—and the battle for football's ultimate club crown begins now.


Season 28 Division 5 Stats and Facts

Santos the clear favourites who will join them.

Quick note, there were 2 obvious ABDs that I noticed and actioned as they may well have gone through before publication.

Santos have a top team in most of the important categories of D5 and would be at least playoff contenders in the division above.  Fiorentina have that rare thing in D5 a 90 rated attacker who will strike fear into the heart of the opposition defence.  Palace could achieve great things if they exchange that 86 rated keepers for an 87and gathered up a bit of depth but they are ranked 3rd.

Celta the first playoff team, attack and midfield are the main strengths Torino a favoured top and tail team a potent 89/89 sandwich perhaps lacking a bit of filling.  If 217.5 is needed to survive D4 then Lazio, Olympiacos, Twente, Fenerbahce and AZ could all push for promotion with little fear of future problems.  Stuttgart continues to be pretty much the worse team in the history of T100 despite the early point which may be few and far between. Spartak also sit adrift of everyone else. Lyon and River Plate at least can see the opposition in the distance.

Quick hint you don’t need to pick up all the best grains of sand to build the best brick wall worth thinking about. All teams could have 11-12 decent players and then the rest could be whatever you make of it to stay competitive.

What does the A.I. make of all this? More or less thinks the same. Torino are predicted to finish lower due to lack of depth, AZ are predicted to be closer to the playoff spots due to the balance in the side and strong keeper.

Giant killers in the cup Lazio or Brugge

  GK DEF MID ATT Top18 Ave ETOT Pre A.I.
Santos FC 89.0 88.8 88.8 89.0 85.0 88.1 220.77 1 1
ACF Fiorentina 88.0 88.3 87.6 90.0 86.0 88.0 220.06 2 3
Crystal Palace 86.0 88.0 89.0 89.0 85.0 87.4 219.97 3 2
Celta Vigo 87.0 87.8 88.2 88.0 86.0 87.4 218.72 4 4
Club Brugge KV 89.0 87.8 87.2 88.0 86.0 87.6 218.16 5 5
Torino 89.0 87.3 87.0 89.0 85.0 87.5 218.13 6 10
SS Lazio 87.0 87.0 88.0 88.0 87.0 87.4 218.08 7 6
Olympiacos 86.0 87.0 88.2 88.0 85.0 86.8 217.88 8 7
FC Twente 87.0 87.3 87.8 88.0 84.0 86.8 217.76 9 9
Fenerbahçe SK 87.0 87.0 87.3 88.5 86.0 87.2 217.69 10 11
AZ Alkmaar 88.0 87.8 86.8 88.0 85.0 87.1 217.60 11 8
Villarreal CF 87.0 86.8 87.0 88.0 86.0 87.0 216.96 12 13
PSV 87.0 86.8 87.0 89.0 80.0 86.0 216.89 13 16
Schalke 88.0 87.0 87.0 87.0 85.0 86.8 216.51 14 12
US Sassuolo 88.0 86.5 87.0 87.0 86.0 86.9 216.23 15 14
Atalanta BC 87.0 86.3 86.8 87.0 85.0 86.4 215.63 16 15
Shakhtar Donetsk 87.0 86.0 86.4 87.0 85.0 86.3 215.11 17 17
Girondins Bordeaux 85.0 85.5 86.4 87.0 82.0 85.2 214.11 18 18
Spartak Moskva 84.0 85.0 86.6 85.0 83.0 84.7 212.57 19 19
Stuttgart 85.0 83.3 82.6 87.0 75.0 82.6 208.43 20 20

New Player Identity Bug Update from SM

Everyone who has signed new players in the last few weeks and later discovered their new signings' identities have changed... File bug reports in-game and/or email support@soccermanager.com with details - see official update message below.

It's a crap solution, imho, but it is what it is at the moment.

I created a form to collect submissions all in one place - I can submit it all in one go to SM. You will need to submit each player separately.

[googleapps domain=“docs” dir=“forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdn_XC3JuqevMnVBtstjT7ZmhL-XYjjE017SbPByvOYK8PxPw/viewform” query=“embedded=true” width=“640” height=“1304” /]

Hi everyone,

We are aware of recent database issues and will be working to reimburse anyone impacted.

There have been a few issues with the player database in recent days and, as a result, we have had to change some newly-added player IDs. This was done as part of the fix, but has led to some unintended consequences. Whilst we are confident the issue will be resolved going forwards, you may have noticed some odd behaviour around transfers involving the players who have had their IDs changed.

If you are impacted by this issue, please reach out to support in-game or through support@soccermanager.com. Please provide details of the player involved, when you made the transfer, and if emailing in, your gameworld ID, when getting in touch. The team will be more than happy to reverse the bugged transfers or refund the amount of in-game cash spent on them.

If you notice any more issues, please drop us a message in Discord bug report channel.

Cheers all, Dylan


Season 28 Division 4 Stats and Facts

Napoli or Valencia which place in sun will be champs.

Napoli are a cut above any other team in the league, a 90 rated keeper, strongest attack, strongest mid should be game set and match even at this early stage. Valencia perhaps a keeper short of challenging their Italian rivals but they should have the defence to lock out most rivals.  Lokomotive also sit pretty in 3rd spot a mighty midfield perhaps shields a lack of depth in parts of a team but nothing unexpected in D4.  That is obviously the point, in D4 an 86 can’t be classed as a week player and an 88 would be considered a strong one.

The playoff places should be contended by 4 of 6 teams which the A.I. and I agree on. PSG a decent attack but weaker in goal are favoured over Dynamo who are a similar team with a stronger defence gut weaker attack.  Montpellier are up for the top and tail approach so favoured in lower league with Marseille and Celtic trying the same tactic.  Independiente are a more balanced squad but do they lack a little depth especially if they get to the playoffs where that is more vital.

You need 219 to survive in division 3 so Partizan should not be discounted if their lack of depth doesn’t hamper them.  Anything less than 218 and you are looking to be served some relegation steak with a side order of sour grapes.  Bremen sits above that cut off.  Kazan looks beyond help at the moment, too weak all round, they will get relegated if nothing is done.  Athletic club really do now need a better keeper to avoid returning to D5.  Lyon are counting on a potent attack out scoring the opposition in high scoring fixtures but this hasn’t gone well so far.  River Plate could just survive. A keeper and defence that is decent for the league with a midfield screen and an ok attack.  Feyenoord even more so than River Plate with Chievo going for the balanced approach. Up for the cup, well Valencia, Dynamo and Marseille should be.

Only one really noticeable disagreement with the A.I. and that is Dynamo Kyiv, I see them mid table or maybe better with that top and tail combo. The A.I. though prefers the more balanced defensive approach of Newcastle to finish in the top half.

  GK DEF MID ATT Top18 Ave ETOT Pre A.I.
SSC Napoli 90.0 88.8 90.2 91.0 85.0 89.0 223.31 1 2
Valencia CF 88.0 90.5 89.6 89.0 87.0 88.8 222.93 2 1
Lokomotiv Moskva 88.0 89.0 90.2 88.0 86.0 88.2 221.44 3 3
Independiente 88.0 88.5 89.0 89.0 86.0 88.1 220.73 4 5
Paris Saint-Germain 87.0 88.8 88.6 89.0 87.0 88.1 220.61 5 6
Dynamo Moskva 87.0 89.3 88.8 88.0 87.0 88.0 220.52 6 4
Montpellier HSC 88.0 87.8 88.8 90.0 85.0 87.9 220.50 7 8
Olympique Marseille 88.0 89.0 87.8 89.0 87.0 88.2 220.29 8 7
Celtic 88.0 87.3 88.2 90.0 85.0 87.7 219.62 9 11
FK Partizan 88.0 87.8 88.0 89.0 84.0 87.4 219.09 10 10
Dynamo Kyiv 88.0 87.0 87.4 90.0 84.0 87.3 218.66 11 15
Newcastle United 89.0 87.3 88.2 88.0 86.0 87.7 218.56 12 9
Beşiktaş JK 87.0 88.0 87.4 88.0 86.0 87.3 218.28 13 12
Bremen 88.0 87.0 88.4 88.0 83.0 86.9 218.04 14 14
Chievo Verona 88.0 87.5 87.6 87.0 86.0 87.2 217.51 15 13
Feyenoord 89.0 87.0 87.4 88.0 84.0 87.1 217.48 16 17
River Plate 89.0 87.0 87.4 87.0 85.0 87.1 216.95 17 16
Olympique Lyonnais 86.0 86.3 86.6 89.0 85.0 86.6 216.65 18 19
Athletic Club 85.0 87.0 87.6 87.0 83.0 85.9 216.39 19 18
Rubin Kazan 84.0 86.5 86.0 88.0 82.0 85.3 215.12 20 20