2019
Brilliant Beddows masters revivial
Real Madrid on the move

Super Beddows has described the recent form as excellent and that the club are moving back in the right direction after an indifferent season overall - which Beddows blamed on himself and the desire to focus on the cup competition, sacrificing form and fitness for League games.
"We obviously want to finish as high as possible but we accept that 4th whilst mathematically possible is highly unlikely to be achieved."
The SMFA Champs Cup Semi second leg on Monday is massive for the club as it is their only chance of silverware this season, Beddows' 3rd in Madrid and still having only won the World Club Cup and Roy Keane Memorial Trophy - can they turn it around against Munich - Beddows is cautious - "our reckon against the Top 4 is poor and we might have to make some tactical changes to overcome Munich - but we will try our very best."
Poll Results
Here are the results of the recent polls everyone has been voting in.
- Improving Top 100 Social Activity
TotW
Doug and Nathan offered to do something similar to Team of the Week. I might try to do something myself, either way.Blog
I've (re)created a new more user-friendly blog Top 100 blog with its own domain - smtop100.blog.I’ve sent out invites to everyone who contributed original material for the blog here, so that once everyone has accepted their invite, I can import all the posts and pages from here to there and the original authors will still be credited, and can write new posts or pages.
2. Manager contracts
An almost Brexit-like result.A small majority of managers in favour of losing their jobs on a regular basis!
We may need to think a bit more about how it will work so that we don’t piss off and lose good managers (which would be the opposite of what we want to do), but I think we can try to introduce it and see how it goes, and take it from there.
3. Sacking managers
A clear winner - starting next season, I can change the game world settings to increase the number of automatic sackings at the end of each season from the bottom two in each division to the bottom three.That will obviously increase the managerial merry-go-round and stimulate the transfer market, which is the intention.
4. Squad cap
I honestly thought this was going to go the other way, but there's no consensus for change, so the squad cap will stay at 50.5. Sanctions for going over 50 players
An overwhelming desire to see increased sanctions for managers going over the 50 player squad cap.Pleasing to see that sanity prevailed and that the new punishment will be the usual transfer ban, plus having to sell to an external club the player or players that took them over the limit, and not being allowed to re-bid on them.
6. Transfer windows
Surprising result to me, but there's clearly no appetite to have transfer windows in Top 100 currently.Stuttgart announce new Fray Bentos Pies link up
Pies and Puddings
'Pie Eyed'
![]() |
| A Fray Bentos Pie today |
Pie Breakfast
![]() |
| A Fray Bentos companion pie |
Young Pies
![]() |
| A Fray Bentos training aid |
Needles
![]() |
| The new Stuttgart club badge |
The Future is Pie Shaped
![]() |
| Into the Fray! |
Poll: Should We Introduce Transfer Window(s)?
What it says on the tin.
If we do, we will still have to discuss and agree if one or two windows and when.
[polldaddy poll=10247813]
Should we introduce Transfer Window(s)?
(polls)
Poll: What Sanctions Should There Be For Managers Who Go Over The Squad Cap?
Another popular, yet contentious, issue.
Managers going over the squad cap tends to become an issue only when new (usually young, possibly future star) players are added to the database, with most of the game world bidding and clubs having a 1 in 50 lottery style chance of winning.
This results in managers bidding when they already have 50 players, either forgetting about it or thinking they won’t win the bid, or failing to sell another player in time.
It’s an easy mistake to make - I’ve done it twice myself.
And it’s easy to assume that the offender is somehow playing the system by taking a one month or three month (for a second offence) transfer ban to get and keep a good young prospect.
But it’s clear that the current sanctions on their own probably aren’t enough of a deterrent to stop it happening, whatever the reasons.
With all that in mind, what sanctions would be effective?
[polldaddy poll=10247774]
What sanction should there be for managers who go over the squad cap?
(polls)
Poll: Should We Change The Squad Cap?
Reducing the squad cap from the current 50 limit to, say 40, is perhaps one of the most popular - and contentious - suggestions to help stimulate the transfer market in Top 100.
So please read the blog summary of the discussion to date, and choose wisely…
[polldaddy poll=10247754]
Should we change the squad cap?
(polls)
Poll: Sacking Managers
A very straightforward one, this.
Should we increase the number of managers who are sacked at the end of each season from just the bottom two to the maximum allowed, which is three?
[polldaddy poll=10247433]
Should we increase the number of sackings per division from 2 to 3?
(polls)
Poll: Dealing With Manager Inactivity - Introducing Contracts
Should we ask managers to commit to achieving certain targets before giving them a new job, and give then a contract from, say, 1 - 6 seasons in length depending on what kind of job it is?
If a manager failed to achieve agreed targets he could then be asked to quit his job. Failure to do so could ultimately end his Top 100 career.
[polldaddy poll=10247311]
Should we introduce contracts for managers when they take on new jobs?
(polls)
Poll: Improving The Top 100 Social Experience
Following on from the devastating news that TOP 100 IS DEAD! here is the weather.
I mean, a poll.
What can we do to spark this beast back into life?
[polldaddy poll=10247215]
What should we do to improve activity on the newsfeed, blog, Facebook Group, etc.?
(polls)
Top 100 Is Dead! Long Live Top 100!
Mike’s addiction to transfer deals led to the most productive and active newsfeed discussion in, well, ever:
Like an extended Dead Parrot sketch, many Top 100 managers complained like Mike that their parrot wasn’t just not very active, or a bit slow, in a lull or a quiet phase, or just a bit stale, but is, in fact dead. An Ex-parrot!
On a more serious note, below is what I hope is a fair summary of the problems highlighted, and the solutions suggested, as well as some of the possible consequences of these proposed fixes.
I’ll do a follow-up post soon with some polls to see who wants what, and when.
I think the main problems that managers highlighted can be broken down into three interconnected areas, as per Mike’s original post:
- Social activity
- Transfer activity
- Manager activity
1. Social activity
Hard to be sure about the newsfeed, although I wasn't around for the start of the Game World. Certainly, blog activity (pageviews) has reduced dramatically if this is any guide:

2. Manager activity
3. Transfer activity
Again, there seems to be strong feeling among most managers who commented on Mike's original post that transfer deals are getting harder to do, for a whole host of reasons. It should be said that there are a few managers who commented that this difficulty is part of what makes Top 100 what is is - a tough challenge! And others that say that it's the inevitable result of any game world after several seasons in.
So what can we do about any of the above problems? What are the suggested solutions?
1. Improving social experience
It's pretty clear people want Team of the Week, or something like it, back. Frank used to so this, and had his own system for doing it. And Doug and Nathan kindly offered to run something similar:
Regarding doing stuff on the blog more generally, that's always been an option for anyone who wants to contribute.
It would be great to do any and all of the other suggestions, and bring back Top 100 TV in some form or other, but all of these ideas require other managers to commit to doing some regular work!
Recent blog stats here show that even when people like myself, Norman, Malcolm, Stephen, Nathan and others have written articles or updates, there are only 10-20 views!
Whether that's down to difficulties with viewing the blog as it is on a mobile phone, not knowing there are updates, or lack of interest in what's been posted, I'm not sure.
Opening up our Facebook page so that all members can post might be a way of increasing activity there, but not everyone wants to or does use FB, and the risk is that like WhatsApp, we just take stuff away from the in-game newsfeed and this blog.
2. Dealing with inactive managers
3. Stimulating the transfer market
Squad cap

Most suggestions were around reducing the squad cap with the expectation that this would force managers to sell unneeded players, thus increasing the number, and perhaps the quality of players available for weaker teams to buy.Some managers suggested that increasing the squad cap - certainly for lower division teams - would be more helpful for their longer term development.I think, overall, while there is lots of support for a reduction in the squad cap, there are also a lot of people against that idea because they believe it will be counter-productive, and/or that it will be unfair to managers who are using different strategies - a bit like moving the goalposts!There were also quite a few suggestions about limiting the youth squad size.
New players
Other suggestions
Voting on suggestions
- Future use of and contribution to the Top 100 newsfeed, blog, Facebook and WhatsApp groups.
- I've created a new 'test' blog here https://smtop100.wordpress.com - it should be easier to use and view using a mobile phone (as well as being easier to create posts and pages, and it allows polls, which Blogger no longer does).
- Introducing contracts for new managers - and extension of managerial stipulations, contracts offered by Top 100 managerial selection panel, and agreed to and/or negotiated by new manager.
- Increasing the number of mandatory sackings from bottom two to the maximum bottom three. Managers can still be offered a new contract with the club they have been sacked from, as now.
- Squad cap - increase or decrease, different caps for each division?
- Squad cap - increased sanctions for going over the limit.
- Introduction of Transfer Window(s).
Scout Centre: Volume 1.
I've decided to start a new series on the blog highlighting external players who have potential. These will primarily be youths but there could be a few reports where I focus on older players (possibly closer to the big reviews). I'll try to get one of these out every 2-4 weeks depending how busy I am, I will also be making sure the players I include aren't on other teams shortlists so I don't ruin other teams scouting plans. I'm not sure how long these will be, and the level of info will vary for each player but hopefully it's something that is enjoyable and that I can keep up.
Farid El Melali.
Having joined SCO Angers in August from Algerian side Paradou AC, El Melali was originally used sparsely by the Ligue 1 team. He made a 14 minute substitute appearance in the 3rd game of the season and made just two more appearances off the bench until mid season. However, he has now begun to be a regularly used late substitute and played in 5 games in a row for the 12th placed team. He picked up an assist against Nantes and could become a regular in the side if he continues to settle well. The right winger is contracted to the club until 2023 and has already represented Algeria twice. The 21-year-old is rated 78 on Soccer Manager and is valued at £600,000 which is a low price for any team. While at the moment he is fairly generic, he could quickly rise if he becomes a regular at Angers.
Sammy Skytte.
After facing relegation with Silkeborg IF last season, Skytte joined FC Midtjylland for £450,000 and is now on loan at AC Horsens. The 21-year-old has been a regular in the centre, making 18 appearances in the Superligaen picking up 2 assists. Skytte has also made 3 appearances for the reserve team where scored 2 goals and assisted 1. Standing at 190cm, Skytte brings a dominant physical presence to the midfield. He has played for the Denmark U21 side and will hope to feature for Midtjylland next season after his successful loan. Soccer Manager value Skytte at £500,000 making him a solid pick up with his 78 rating.
Emmanuel Iyoha.
Since arriving at Dusseldorf in 2011, Iyoha has progressed through the youth levels before breaking into the senior team durinf the 16/17 season. He made 17 appearances before being loaned out to 3.Liga side VfL Osnabruck last season. He made 25 appearances, netting 4 goals and assiting 2 more. Now aged 21, the striker is on loan at Erzgebirge Aue in the 2.Bundesliga. He has played in 17 games in which time he has set up 5 goals and scored 2 himself. The 6'3" forward has also featured for Germany at U19 and U20 levels. Iyoha is rated 77 and can be bought for just £600,000 in Top 100. Iyoha has impressed this season averaging a rating of 6.78 this season according to Who Scored. He could potentially look at returning to Dusseldorf next season to play in the top tier of German football.Sebastian Vasiliadis.
David Schnegg
Another free summer arrival, Schnegg joined FC Liefering in the second tier of Austria. Liefering are a feeder club of RB Salzburg. The 20-year-old has been the number 1 left back this season but can also play further up the left. The Austrian has provided a goal and an assist this season for Liefering. With RB Leipzig captain Andreas Ulmer now 33, there will be a gap at left back in the near future. This could potentially be filled by the talented full back. Schnegg is rated 75 and valued at just £340,000 on Soccer Manager. He could be a quick riser if he plays his cards right and could end up at Salzburg or possibly even Leipzig in the near future.
monaco review and future
Youth Cup and Shield 2nd Round Draws
Ties to be played on Saturday 5th January 2018 (if you cant do this date please arrange first leg on Wednesday 9th. Return legs to be played on Saturday 12th January.
Fictional Extra time over the two legs in the event of TWO same score draws will be used. Away goals will be used as well as the first determiner.
| youth cup 1st Leg/2nd Leg | ||
| match 1 | Basel | Benfica |
| match 2 | Flamengo | Barcelona |
| match 3 | Sevillia | Borussia Dormund |
| match 4 | Monchengladbach | Bayern Munich |
| match 5 | AC Milan | Real Madrid |
| match 6 | Club Brugge | Anderltecht |
| match 7 | Southampton | Man City |
| match 8 | Beskitas | Juventus |
| youth shield | ||
| match 1 | Tottenham | Atletico Madrid |
| match 2 | PSV | River Plate |
| match 3 | Lyon | Newcastle |
| match 4 | Malaga | Stoke City |
| match 5 | Indeptendiente | Chelsea |
| match 6 | Werder Bremen | Napoli |
| match 7 | Sassulo | Celta Vigo |
| match 8 | Rubin Kazan | Genoa |
| match 2 | v | 1 |
| match 3 | v | 4 |
| match 6 | v | 5 |
| match 7 | v | 8 |






















