2016
Match Day 38 - The Final Countdown
THEY SAY ITS TOUGH AT THE TOP BUT I SAY ITS TOUGHER TO BEAT THE DROP. FINAL DAY POSITIONS
SM Top 100 TV (Episode 7)
BEDDOWS SPOTTED AT A STATUS QUO GIG LAST NIGHT
EUROPE HERE WE COME
The Fictional Extra Time Debate
Fictional extra time of course came about in Season 2 of Top 100 in order to provide a means of finding a fair winner in cup fixtures within such tournaments as the Top 100 Youth Cup & the Top 100 World Championship whereby arranging additional fixtures / replays was not feasible due to time available to complete the competitions within the 38 game week season.
Recently brought up by Broon, the debate now is the method of deciding victors in games drawn in future competitions in the knockout stages of those competitions.
There are currently 2 ideas suggested for deciding these games;
1: Average Rating Totals
Using the recent Top 100 Youth Cup final 2nd leg game as an example to explain this you have a game that was drawn 3-3. If this were a 1 leg match the average rating totals would have scored as follows;
Lokomotiv Moscow score 70 from the first 11 meaning that in total Juventus would be awarded the game based on the ‘better performance’ of their starting 11 players.
The pros here are as the above point suggests, the first 11 of Juventus scored higher as a whole despite drawing the game & ‘performed better’ however the cons are that Juventus had K.Coman sent off after 58 minutes meaning his rating was not scored over 90 minutes & neither were the subs. Additionally some players leave the field of play later or sooner than others & therefore it is not a completely fair contest.
2: Match Stat Criteria
The method adapted in season 2 where by an odd number of criteria were suggested as providing random but fair means of deciding a winner of the game.
Again using the same match as was used in the above example for Average Rating Totals we have the match stats from that game;
The Managerial Sacking Debate
Top 100 maintains various codes of conduct & sporting managers willing to risk it all in fairness to the game world. Current rules of the game world state that managers / clubs who finish in the bottom 2 places of a division (19th & 20th) will part ways in keeping things realistic to the point that the manager has not delivered what a club would aim for over the course of a season.
There are 3 current proposals in regards to the sackings of managers to discuss.
1: Managerial Sackings with Self-Imposed Stipulations
No criteria for keeping your job whatsoever. Upon taking a club you know the risks & must evaluate the clubs stance within the league & agree that in taking the club on you are doing so knowing that if you finish 19th or 20th you will be sacked. Should you join in game week 1 or 36 you do so knowing that finishing 19th or 20th will see your time at the club ended. A no ifs, no buts, ruling. We have managerial sackings in Top 100 & therefore they should be imposed no matter what.
Avoids any grey areas in why some managers receive more ’leeway’ in keeping their job at a club compared to another.
- Juventus finish below 7th in Division 1
- Juventus do not make a final in any of the cup competitions
2: Criteria Based Managerial Sackings & Stipulations
Various criteria can however count in a managers favour when underachieving;
- Time in Charge - A manager's total number of games with a club will be considered if they are in a position to warrant being sacked. Should a manager have had half a season or less in control of a club (>20 games) they may be granted extra time with the club in the following season.
- Managerial History - Should a manager have won promotion to a higher division the previous season to the one they find themselves in a position to warrant being sacked this will be considered.
- Club Achievements - If a manager has won a trophy during the season they find themselves in a position to warrant being sacked this will benefit their chances of maintaining their job.
- GameWorld Contributions - A mixture of contributions to the blog, news feed & general social scene within Top 100 could count as a positive in a managers favour should they see themselves in a position that would warrant being sacked.
- Olympique Lyon must finish 7th or better in season 3.
- Olympique Lyon can additionally achieve a cup final for Warren Livesey to maintain his job at the club.
- AC Milan must finish in 7th or better in season 3 for Stephen Beddows to maintain his job at the club.
Due to the current standings & timings that Top 100 is in (Season 2, Game Week 37) the rule decided (1, 2, 3) would be enforced as of Season 3 onwards unless agreed upon otherwise.
I must add these are my personal / briefly discussed & concluded ideas or takes on the system currently in place & attempts to remove any grey areas on the subject.










