2023
Rockin' the Casbah
Now over at the temple
Oh, they really pack 'em in
The in-crowd say it's cool
To dig this chanting thing
But as the wind changed direction
And the temple band took fire
The crowd caught a whiff
Of that crazy Casbah jive
So said The Clash in 1982 .... but what say us .... or more importantly to us Top100 managers .... what say the god of SM player ratings with this massive influx of top footballing talent in the Middle Eastern kingdoms. Not known to be destinations of top shelf talent who could still easily get contracts at the top European leagues, in the top six teams. Not known to offer the personal freedoms that many, if not all of these players, have enjoyed during their professional careers up to this point.
Of course, there is a rather large .... erm .... carrot being offered to help undecided footballers on whether the chance to play in the oasis that is Saudi Arabia is for them .....

A lot of money. A life changing sum, even for footballers, is being used to parachute significant top tier talent into the KSA, to potentially change this league, transform this league, for a number of years.
So who are The Wild Geese ...
I asked our SC Internacional player scouting group to put together a list of who has left the relative safety of established leagues and infrastructures to chase the sand dollar ... and paired them up with their SM ratings ...

The grouping above is by league, by club, with the SM rating added into the last column. The KSA dominate, with a handful of players landing in Qatar (I would hazard a guess that at least two of them have since fired their agents, for not knowing the difference between the KSA and Qatar ... as in being separate countries). The three clubs with the most talent brought in, are the household names Al-Ahli, Al-Hilal and Al-Nassr. I stopped at 88 rating, there are eleven (11) 87's and eleven (11) 86's as well. Some serious talent assembled at these clubs fellow managers ... some serious talent.
Share of SM Talent in KSA and Qatar
The chart below shows, by rating (x-axis), from 96 to 88 the counts of SM players in the KSA and Qatar. For example, of the seven (7) 95's in our game, two (2) are in the KSA now, Benzema and Neymar. The blue line is a cumulative plot of rating now plying their trade in Middle East, plotted against the second axis (%). For example, of all ... ALL ... players rated 90 and above, 5% now play in the KSA.

That is a HUGE percentage of players. Crazy times.
What does mean for SM ratings ?
I will defer that supremely talented footballer, known for his intellectualization of tactics, in game modifications and adjustments, a pure understanding of the game ...

Sorry ... not you Gareth Bale ....
I don't know what this means ... SM rating changes can be on point, or mostly on point. Sometimes it looks like that they asked a monkey to throw darts at a board whilst handing upside down. Perhaps, with such an influx of talent, SM will take a breath, and wait for at least a dozen matches to be played (their seasons have just kicked off), before jumping to conclusions that everyone listed is an automatic -2 in the next review. What I do think will happen is this league will get more than the once every eighteen months (1 in 18) review treatment of the past.
Some owners of these players will be a little nervous holding onto them, unsure of what the future holds. Others will not give a sheet. Some might have already sold them on not wanting to play the 'meet me at the Istanbul KSA Embassy for a visa and rating appointment' in the next several months. Just ask Eddie Howe about that playing ten man Liverpool for 62 minutes on Sunday ...
What I can tell you ... is that our US Fox Sports cable channels are showing Saudi Pro League match replays during the waking hours (sunrise to sunset) of the day. Which they never did before.
Who knows where this all goes ...
I have no idea where this all ends up. Does the Saudi Pro League win the ACC Champions Cup 10-0 against some unfortunate South Korean or Japanese side ? How many of these players see out their full contracts ? Do the 35 players listed find themselves rates -2 or -3 in our game in 12 months time ? How do the players feel about the double headers being discussed for matches at the end of season ... stonings at 6pm, kick-off at 8pm ?
This story has a lot more legs in it than Sports Illustrated Swim Suit calendar shoot ... and a little bit of cheek too ....

Season 21 Division 2 Stats and Facts
Levante heading back to Division 1?
Straight 90 rated Levante seem set to gain promotion, the only real area of weakness is the depth. Stoke though in 2nd have a stronger attack and should be able to challenge them. Sao Paulo have the strongest midfield and are well balanced. Sporting perhaps a keeper short of promotion have a potent outfield and one of the strongest attacks. Liege go for the top and tail approach but do lack some depth. We then have SC Internacional who go out and out depth as the others falter they could well move up the table.
To survive D1 you will need a rating of 224 so Liverpool would also fancy their chance at promotion or play off success.
As for relegation anything under 220 leaves you in real risk of problems. Hamburg know that they will need strong tactics to finish anywhere other than last. Espanyol lack a strong attack and are weak in defence. Promoted Celta are much more potent up top but again do they have enough in defence to survive. Hoffenheim are also ok at the front but a weak keeper, defensive combination will be troublesome. AC Milan seem to be more balanced and have good depth,
Division 2 is substantially weaker than last season both on average and the highest / lowest side dropping around 2 points.
| GK | DEF | MID | ATT | Top18 | Ave | ETOT | Pre | |
| Levante UD | 90.0 | 90.8 | 90.8 | 91.0 | 86.0 | 89.7 | 225.51 | 1 |
| Stoke City | 89.0 | 89.8 | 89.8 | 93.0 | 85.0 | 89.3 | 224.97 | 2 |
| São Paulo FC | 90.0 | 89.8 | 91.8 | 90.0 | 86.0 | 89.5 | 224.90 | 3 |
| Sporting CP | 88.0 | 90.0 | 90.0 | 92.0 | 85.0 | 89.0 | 224.56 | 4 |
| Standard Liège | 91.0 | 89.8 | 89.6 | 92.0 | 85.0 | 89.5 | 224.40 | 5 |
| SC Internacional | 90.0 | 90.3 | 89.6 | 91.0 | 88.0 | 89.8 | 224.39 | 6 |
| Liverpool | 89.0 | 89.8 | 90.0 | 91.0 | 87.0 | 89.4 | 224.07 | 7 |
| Paris Saint-Germain | 89.0 | 90.0 | 89.6 | 90.0 | 87.0 | 89.1 | 223.30 | 8 |
| Manchester United | 88.0 | 88.0 | 90.6 | 91.0 | 87.0 | 88.9 | 223.03 | 9 |
| Udinese Calcio | 88.0 | 89.3 | 89.0 | 90.0 | 87.0 | 88.7 | 222.10 | 10 |
| Hertha BSC | 89.0 | 88.8 | 89.3 | 90.0 | 86.0 | 88.6 | 221.90 | 11 |
| Fenerbahçe SK | 88.0 | 87.3 | 90.3 | 89.5 | 86.0 | 88.2 | 221.06 | 12 |
| Celtic | 89.0 | 88.8 | 88.4 | 89.0 | 87.0 | 88.4 | 220.69 | 13 |
| Werder Bremen | 88.0 | 88.8 | 88.6 | 89.0 | 86.0 | 88.1 | 220.61 | 14 |
| Tottenham Hotspur | 88.0 | 88.8 | 88.6 | 89.0 | 85.0 | 87.9 | 220.49 | 15 |
| AC Milan | 88.0 | 88.3 | 88.8 | 88.0 | 87.0 | 88.0 | 219.84 | 16 |
| TSG 1899 Hoffenheim | 87.0 | 87.8 | 88.4 | 88.0 | 86.0 | 87.4 | 218.88 | 17 |
| Celta Vigo | 88.0 | 86.8 | 88.4 | 89.0 | 86.0 | 87.6 | 218.85 | 18 |
| RCD Espanyol | 88.0 | 86.8 | 88.8 | 86.0 | 85.0 | 86.9 | 217.10 | 19 |
| Hamburger SV | 89.0 | 85.8 | 87.2 | 86.0 | 85.0 | 86.6 | 215.14 | 20 |
Review of Hamburger's season
At the start of Season 20, I had a team half full of 89, 90, 91 and even 92 rated players.
Unfortunately, they had an average age of 93, and a tradeable value of about £94 each.
And even with their decent ratings, my side's average was still better than only four or five teams in Division Two.

STICKY SITUATION
I was in a sticky situation.
I could stick with what I had and maybe challenge for the playoffs (if I got my tactics right more times than not).
Or, if the SM gods were against me, I could spend the season fighting relegation.
Or I could make the most of what little player exchange value my players still had and rebuild.
TEA AND BISCUITS
With the end of contracts thrust upon us, I felt that I had to be bold.
It was now or never.
If I didn't move them on now, my players would only decrease in value (and ratings).
They would cost a fortune in tea, biscuits and nappies, before retiring and leaving me with nothing.
To allow me to focus on some kind of rebuild, I brought in a previously unknown but extremely precocious tactical coach, Guglielmo Bardelli.
IMAGINARY FRIEND
My imaginary friend would take over control of all match preparation, team selection, formation and tactical decisions for almost all of the season.

On the few occasions I intervened, we lost.
Bardelli pulled off some audacious wins - Sao Paulo home and away, Genoa in the Shield, Sporting away, Chelsea and Barcelona in the Youth Cup.
We topped the table early on.
But as the season progressed, I was selling ratings for youth and he had less and less to play with (except in the Youth Cup, of course, where he had more and more).
CLEAN SHEETS
More importantly, perhaps, than a few big wins against big teams and big managers, Bardelli ensured victories over teams we knew we had to beat to have any hope of avoiding relegation - including double 1-0 wins over Zenit and River Plate.
Peter Gulacsi was a revelation in goal and between him and his replacement Kepa they kept 12 clean sheets.
We started the season with a 90 rated team of pensioners - Gulacsi, Clauss, Alderweireld, Vertonghen, Alba, Naby Keita, Cabella, Luis Suarez, Ashley Young, Slimani, The Ox, Willian, and Enzo Perez.
ALL GONE
They've all gone.
Gulacsi (somewhat unfairly I felt) got a -1 in the reviews, as did Vertonghen, Alba, and Luis Suarez.
Naby somewhow retained his 90 rating, but expect he will be at 88 next time.
In their place, I've got Kepa (who got a +1 and is now Real Madrid's new goalkeeper), Marcus Pedersen, Jaka Bijol (who somehow didn't get a rise this time despite being one of the best performing CBs in Serie A), Quentin Merlin, Sambi Lokonga, Jose Cifuentes, Angelo Stiller (to complete move next season), Emile Smith Rowe, Morgan Gibbs-White, Ander Barrenetxea, Georginio Rutter, Yann Karamoh and Cameron Archer, among others.
NO THOUGHT
I also let go of Willian Pacho (for Smith Rowe), Savio and Ratkov (for Tom Krauss for the Youth Cup effort), and Asllani (for Turati, again for Youth Cup). When I let Pacho go, I had no thought of getting beyond the second round of the Youth Cup, but really did need to strengthen our midfield options for the first team.
My team now has an average rating of 87, which is a huge drop. Alessandro at Ajax tried something similar and unfortunately paid with relegation and his job.
TERRIFIC ACHIEVEMENT
So I was over the moon to finish in 13th place for the second season running, with two more points than before.
We also finished third in the Youth Cup, which was a terrific achievement considering we started with a 67 rated goalkeeper, and a team average of 79 for the opening group game. We're well set for next season, too.
CRAZY TACTICS
Next season in D2 is going to be very tough. I took over tactical operations again for the final few games of the season, as Guglielmo Bardelli started conceding huge amounts of goals with, frankly, some crazy tactics. He's now the Technical Director of Football.
Hopefully I can find the right combination to win enough points to stay up, and buy some time for my players to develop in real life and in SM ratings. I'm not saying we have world beaters, but I think the club overall is in a much better position for value and potential going forward than it was at the start of the season.
Season 21 Division 1 Stats and Facts
Can Chelsea overcome the champions as the stats predict.
A fairly narrow gap splits the top two teams. Hellas have greater depth and a superior defence than Chelsea and match them up top. Chelsea will be using their keeper and midfield to screen the opposing sides.
Dortmund are their closest rivals a well balanced side with a potent attack. Porto are a similar side to Chelsea with the same kind of balance with Juve another side that is balanced throughout.
Benfica have an obvious weakness in defence but are otherwise a tough side to crack, Bayern have greater depth than any side in the league and as the season goes on they should make greater progress. Everton are the wild card side for me, lacking in depth a weaker keeper but on their day could match anyone.
As for relegation 224 is a fair cut off. This leave 5 sides in obvious danger. Villa with less depth a relatively poor keeper and defence combo might be in more trouble than 17th suggests. Valencia have a strong attack but may struggle throughout as will Southampton. West Brom go for the top and tail technique. Hope your keeper saves you and the attack can punt in a few goals.
Division 1 is slightly stronger than last season but with less difference between the highest and lowest teams.
| Gk | Def | Mid | Att | Top18 | Ave | ETOT | Pre | |
| Chelsea | 95.0 | 91.5 | 94.4 | 96.0 | 86.0 | 92.6 | 232.84 | 1 |
| Hellas Verona (C) | 91.0 | 92.8 | 93.2 | 96.0 | 87.0 | 92.0 | 232.52 | 2 |
| Borussia Dortmund | 92.0 | 92.8 | 93.2 | 95.0 | 87.0 | 92.0 | 231.99 | 3 |
| FC Porto | 94.0 | 91.5 | 92.5 | 96.0 | 85.0 | 91.8 | 231.08 | 4 |
| Juventus | 93.0 | 92.5 | 93.4 | 93.0 | 86.0 | 91.6 | 230.65 | 5 |
| SL Benfica | 95.0 | 89.8 | 93.4 | 95.0 | 86.0 | 91.8 | 229.99 | 6 |
| Bayern München | 94.0 | 91.0 | 92.2 | 93.0 | 88.0 | 91.6 | 228.85 | 7 |
| Leicester City | 91.0 | 90.5 | 91.8 | 93.0 | 86.0 | 90.5 | 227.53 | 8 |
| Arsenal | 90.0 | 91.3 | 91.0 | 92.0 | 86.0 | 90.1 | 226.72 | 9 |
| Manchester City | 94.0 | 90.5 | 91.8 | 91.0 | 87.0 | 90.9 | 226.71 | 10 |
| Barcelona | 92.0 | 90.8 | 91.0 | 92.0 | 86.0 | 90.4 | 226.56 | 11 |
| Real Madrid | 90.0 | 90.5 | 90.4 | 92.0 | 87.0 | 90.0 | 225.76 | 12 |
| Bayer Leverkusen | 90.0 | 90.3 | 90.6 | 92.0 | 87.0 | 90.0 | 225.72 | 13 |
| Everton | 89.0 | 89.8 | 91.2 | 91.0 | 84.0 | 89.0 | 224.67 | 14 |
| Genoa CFC | 91.0 | 91.8 | 90.0 | 89.0 | 87.0 | 89.8 | 224.61 | 15 |
| Atlético Madrid | 91.0 | 90.3 | 91.4 | 89.0 | 86.0 | 89.5 | 224.41 | 16 |
| Aston Villa | 89.0 | 89.3 | 90.4 | 91.0 | 85.0 | 88.9 | 223.75 | 17 |
| Valencia CF | 89.0 | 88.5 | 89.8 | 91.0 | 87.0 | 89.1 | 222.91 | 18 |
| Southampton | 89.0 | 88.5 | 89.6 | 90.0 | 87.0 | 88.8 | 222.10 | 19 |
| West Bromwich Albion | 90.0 | 88.5 | 88.8 | 91.0 | 85.0 | 88.7 | 221.99 | 20 |
Top 100 Season 22 Manager of the Season Results:
1st Andre Libras-Boas
2nd Dan Wallace
3rd Salvatore Zerbo
I personally do not believe these results were are legitimate (although I have no proof). The usual turnout is less than 50%. This time the turn out was 82% (supposedly). Therefore multiple voting 'may' have occurred which I believe is the case.
Therefore If somebody else wishes to compile the MOTS awards from next season please feel free- peace out.
Season 21 Division 5 Stats and Facts Independiente are the predicted champions with 8 teams in a pack behind them.
Usual explanation here:
Teams are rated using a formula which looks at the 4 main positions, GK,DEF,MID and FWD, along with the 18th ranked player ( the lowest ranked player likely to play ) and the Average.
This produced ETOT the ranking used to work out the final position. This formula is more or less unchanged from around season 4 onwards. There is human input in deciding the most likely team. In addition on occasions the 18th ranked player ( or less ) in much lower rated, I may choose to ignore that to not skew the stats.
Independiente have a really solid side, it should be a relatively easy ride into D4, they top and tail their team nicely and have good depth. Then perhaps much like the current seasons the rest of the placings will be hard fought by a large number of teams. Boca and Lazio also both top and tail their team with a strong GK, ATT combo. Lazio lack depth which will cost them. Santos have a good midfield but are weaker uptop.
Spartak need a good keeper as do Kyiv,. Kazan look well balanced again.
The cut off for survival in D4 isn’t that high at 216.5 so this rightly suggest all teams down to Athletic club could feature in the playoff and get promoted.
Lower down only the sack race to worry about. Basel, Lyon and Partizan lack any depth. Newcastle need a good rebuild with only rating above 87.
Division 5 is considerably stronger than last year up half a rating point from the previous season. This is probably due to rebuilds, no contracts and a particularly weak team gaining promotion.
| GK | DEF | MID | ATT | Top18 | Ave | ETOT | Pre | |
| Independiente | 89.0 | 88.5 | 88.4 | 89.0 | 86.0 | 88.2 | 220.37 | 1 |
| Boca Juniors | 89.0 | 87.3 | 88.4 | 88.0 | 85.0 | 87.5 | 218.60 | 2 |
| SS Lazio | 91.0 | 86.8 | 88.5 | 89.0 | 80.0 | 87.1 | 218.57 | 3 |
| Santos FC | 88.0 | 87.8 | 88.4 | 87.0 | 86.0 | 87.4 | 218.35 | 4 |
| Spartak Moskva | 86.0 | 87.0 | 88.6 | 88.0 | 86.0 | 87.1 | 218.32 | 5 |
| Dynamo Kyiv | 86.0 | 87.3 | 87.4 | 89.0 | 86.0 | 87.1 | 218.21 | 6 |
| Rubin Kazan | 88.0 | 87.3 | 88.0 | 88.0 | 85.0 | 87.3 | 218.16 | 7 |
| Club Brugge KV | 88.0 | 87.0 | 87.4 | 88.0 | 85.0 | 87.1 | 217.48 | 8 |
| Villarreal CF | 87.0 | 87.8 | 87.2 | 87.0 | 86.0 | 87.0 | 217.27 | 9 |
| Shakhtar Donetsk | 87.0 | 87.3 | 87.8 | 87.0 | 85.0 | 86.8 | 217.23 | 10 |
| Olympique Marseille | 88.0 | 87.5 | 87.0 | 87.0 | 85.0 | 86.9 | 216.91 | 11 |
| SSC Napoli | 88.0 | 87.0 | 87.3 | 87.0 | 85.0 | 86.9 | 216.71 | 12 |
| PSV | 87.0 | 86.3 | 86.8 | 89.0 | 83.0 | 86.4 | 216.69 | 13 |
| Athletic Club | 87.0 | 87.0 | 87.3 | 87.0 | 85.0 | 86.7 | 216.59 | 14 |
| Chievo Verona | 88.0 | 86.5 | 87.0 | 87.5 | 83.0 | 86.4 | 216.20 | 15 |
| Besiktas JK | 88.0 | 86.5 | 87.0 | 87.0 | 85.0 | 86.7 | 216.11 | 16 |
| FC Basel | 87.0 | 87.3 | 86.4 | 87.0 | 83.0 | 86.1 | 215.87 | 17 |
| Olympique Lyonnais | 86.0 | 86.3 | 87.4 | 87.0 | 82.0 | 85.7 | 215.63 | 18 |
| FK Partizan | 87.0 | 84.8 | 87.3 | 89.0 | 81.0 | 85.8 | 215.61 | 19 |
| Newcastle United | 86.0 | 86.5 | 86.4 | 87.0 | 85.0 | 86.2 | 215.39 | 20 |
CSKA - the 1 YR Milestone
The beginning of September will mark both one year in T100, at CSKA, and 100 games managed. It also coincides nicely with a season recap blog post.
A lot has happened in the year. We've gone through almost 2.5 seasons - making the playoffs with an unexpected run in the first half season, following up with a playoff loss in season 2, and gaining promotion season 3. It was disappointing slipping out of the leader position on the last day, though I think we'd all say Gursi had a superior team and (maybe) was more deserving of the title. The coach's lack of tactical acumen certainly played a role as well.
From a roster turnover standpoint, I believe we have 7 original players. We've undertaken an almost complete rebuild, especially within the youth team. One never knows how youth will pan out, but we've got a few top tier prospects and hopefully a few will break into the first team soon as we're papering over holes at the moment.
The team was also relocated to the United States due to economic sanctions forced upon Russia. The relocation came with a global rebrand. CSKA Moscow Texas now stands for "Chris' Soccer Kids Academy." Team colors are red, white, and blue in a nod to both the Russian, US, and Texan flags. The team mascot is a bull, symbolizing both aggression and the Texan cattle industry. Unfortunately, the rebrand has yet to resonate globally, and Eastern European new boys Szczesny and Brozovic were bitterly disappointed to learn they would be traveling to the US and not closer to home.
We're looking forward to Division 3 and hopefully many more years at CSKA.
Season 20 Division 5 Stats and Facts
Atalanta deserved leaders in the stats and they win the league.
Finishing 3 places above expected Atatlanta have +4 PVA. They sit just above fellow promoted team Montpellier who have a VA of +9. However the teams with the highest VA are Besitkas and Seville on +10 , both made the playoffs although only Seville survived the first round. Athletic club the opponents of Seville sit on +6 VA and Newcastle get an honourable mention on +6 VA
Poor performances though from 4 of the top 6 predicted sides see that at the wrong end of the stats. Kazan should have been 3rd but came 11th they have the joint lowest VA on -8 and lowest PVA on -0.64. Villareal should have made the playoffs but didn’t they also have -8 VA along with Marseille. Boca made the playoffs but their promotion hopes were blown out by Seville.
3 of the lowest 4 predicted teams finished in the lowest 4
| GK | DEF | MID | ATT | Top18 | Ave | ETOT | Pre | Fin | VA | PVA | |
| Atalanta BC | 87.0 | 87.0 | 87.4 | 89.0 | 86.0 | 87.3 | 218.13 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 4.00 |
| Montpellier HSC | 87.0 | 86.5 | 87.0 | 88.0 | 85.0 | 86.7 | 216.64 | 12 | 3 | 9 | 3.33 |
| Besiktas JK | 88.0 | 86.5 | 87.0 | 87.0 | 85.0 | 86.7 | 216.11 | 14 | 4 | 10 | 2.75 |
| Sevilla | 88.0 | 86.0 | 87.0 | 87.0 | 85.0 | 86.6 | 215.71 | 16 | 6 | 10 | 1.83 |
| Athletic Club | 87.0 | 87.0 | 87.2 | 87.0 | 84.0 | 86.4 | 216.43 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 1.00 |
| Newcastle United | 86.0 | 86.3 | 86.8 | 87.0 | 85.0 | 86.2 | 215.51 | 19 | 13 | 6 | 0.54 |
| VfB Stuttgart | 88.0 | 88.0 | 88.6 | 88.0 | 86.0 | 87.7 | 219.36 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0.50 |
| SS Lazio | 87.0 | 83.8 | 86.4 | 89.0 | 80.0 | 85.2 | 214.01 | 20 | 17 | 3 | 0.24 |
| Club Brugge KV | 88.0 | 86.8 | 87.2 | 88.0 | 85.0 | 87.0 | 217.12 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 0.00 |
| Olympique Lyonnais | 88.0 | 87.0 | 87.4 | 87.0 | 86.0 | 87.1 | 216.95 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 0.00 |
| FC Basel | 87.0 | 86.3 | 86.4 | 88.0 | 85.0 | 86.5 | 215.96 | 15 | 16 | -1 | 0.00 |
| Chievo Verona | 88.0 | 86.3 | 86.6 | 87.0 | 85.0 | 86.6 | 215.59 | 17 | 18 | -1 | 0.00 |
| PSV | 87.0 | 85.5 | 86.8 | 88.0 | 84.0 | 86.3 | 215.52 | 18 | 20 | -2 | -0.05 |
| Independiente | 89.0 | 86.8 | 87.2 | 87.0 | 86.0 | 87.2 | 216.71 | 10 | 12 | -2 | -0.08 |
| Spartak Moskva | 87.0 | 86.3 | 88.3 | 87.0 | 86.0 | 86.9 | 216.91 | 9 | 15 | -6 | -0.33 |
| Olympique Marseille | 88.0 | 87.3 | 87.0 | 87.0 | 85.0 | 86.9 | 216.71 | 11 | 19 | -8 | -0.37 |
| Santos FC | 88.0 | 87.5 | 88.2 | 87.0 | 86.0 | 87.3 | 217.99 | 5 | 10 | -5 | -0.40 |
| Villarreal CF | 86.0 | 87.5 | 87.0 | 88.0 | 86.0 | 86.9 | 217.44 | 6 | 14 | -8 | -0.50 |
| Boca Juniors | 89.0 | 87.2 | 87.8 | 90.0 | 85.0 | 87.8 | 219.38 | 1 | 5 | -4 | -0.60 |
| Rubin Kazan | 88.0 | 87.5 | 88.2 | 88.0 | 86.0 | 87.5 | 218.64 | 3 | 11 | -8 | -0.64 |
Season 20 Division 4 Stats and Facts review.
The top 3 in the league are in the top 3 of the stats.
Koln will be celebrating like Rose Monday after they lead the stats and the league with +7 VA , 1st place and +8 PVA.
Third in the league but 2nd in the stats are Crystal Palace on +9 VA, CSKA 3rd place in the stats but 2nd in the league finished 5 places above expected. Olympiacos in 4th spot in the league have +11VA and qualify for the play off spots. Big notable +7 for Fiorentina who looked like relegation fodder but survived well to finish 12th.
Predicted 1 /2 in the league finish 20th and 19th in the stats one of 3 teams on -9 VA. AZ , Feynenoord and Partizan all fell below their expected finishing positions.
|
| GK | DEF | MID | ATT | Top18 | Ave | ETOT | Pre | Fin | VA | PVA |
| 1. FC Köln | 89.0 | 87.5 | 87.8 | 88.0 | 83.0 | 87.1 | 218.08 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 8.00 |
| Crystal Palace | 87.0 | 87.3 | 87.4 | 88.0 | 86.0 | 87.1 | 217.68 | 12 | 3 | 9 | 3.33 |
| CSKA Moskva | 90.0 | 88.0 | 87.4 | 88.0 | 85.0 | 87.7 | 218.52 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 3.00 |
| Olympiacos | 87.0 | 87.3 | 87.0 | 88.0 | 86.0 | 87.1 | 217.36 | 16 | 5 | 11 | 2.40 |
| ACF Fiorentina | 88.0 | 86.5 | 86.6 | 87.0 | 85.0 | 86.6 | 215.79 | 19 | 12 | 7 | 0.67 |
| Dynamo Moskva | 87.0 | 87.0 | 87.8 | 88.0 | 85.0 | 87.0 | 217.68 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0.56 |
| Málaga CF | 86.0 | 88.0 | 88.8 | 88.0 | 85.0 | 87.2 | 219.16 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0.50 |
| Shakhtar Donetsk | 87.0 | 85.5 | 85.8 | 89.0 | 84.0 | 86.3 | 215.41 | 20 | 17 | 3 | 0.24 |
| Dnipro Dnipropetrovsk | 87.0 | 86.8 | 87.2 | 87.0 | 86.0 | 86.8 | 216.47 | 17 | 16 | 1 | 0.13 |
| AS Saint-Etienne | 87.0 | 86.3 | 87.5 | 89.0 | 85.0 | 87.0 | 217.49 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 0.07 |
| SSC Napoli | 88.0 | 87.0 | 87.0 | 87.0 | 82.0 | 86.2 | 216.15 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 0.06 |
| Girondins Bordeaux | 87.0 | 88.3 | 88.2 | 88.0 | 85.0 | 87.3 | 219.00 | 6 | 8 | -2 | -0.13 |
| Torino | 86.0 | 87.5 | 87.6 | 88.0 | 86.0 | 87.0 | 217.92 | 10 | 13 | -3 | -0.15 |
| Dynamo Kyiv | 87.0 | 87.3 | 87.0 | 88.0 | 86.0 | 87.1 | 217.36 | 15 | 19 | -4 | -0.16 |
| Lille OSC | 90.0 | 87.0 | 89.0 | 89.0 | 85.0 | 88.0 | 219.65 | 4 | 7 | -3 | -0.29 |
| US Sassuolo | 89.0 | 88.5 | 88.4 | 88.0 | 86.0 | 88.0 | 219.72 | 3 | 6 | -3 | -0.33 |
| Lokomotiv Moskva | 87.0 | 86.8 | 88.2 | 88.0 | 86.0 | 87.2 | 217.92 | 9 | 15 | -6 | -0.33 |
| FK Partizan | 87.0 | 86.8 | 87.4 | 89.0 | 85.0 | 87.0 | 217.81 | 11 | 20 | -9 | -0.40 |
| Feyenoord | 87.0 | 88.3 | 89.0 | 89.0 | 87.0 | 88.1 | 220.53 | 2 | 11 | -9 | -0.73 |
| AZ Alkmaar | 87.0 | 89.0 | 89.8 | 90.0 | 85.0 | 88.2 | 222.18 | 1 | 10 | -9 | -0.80 |
Season 20 Division 3 Stats and Facts review.
Celta Vigo +14 VA and + 7.5 PVA head the stats and get promoted, just above their Turkish rivals.
It isn’t very often that a +7 VA and auto promotion wouldn’t get you the team of the year in D3 but Fenerbache’s fantastic performance is eclipsed by their Galician rivals. Celtic third in the stats , also make the play offs with +8VA. Levante in 4th spot got promoted as they should have done as leaders. Have to give Beddows some credit for a +7 VA and avoiding relegation with Sampdoria, with Twente the other notable overperformers.
Augsburg on -12VA are heading in the wrong direction , relegated when playoffs were more than achievable, they sit lowest in the stats. Schalke miss out on playoff and promotion and a -5 VA leaves them 2nd lowest in the stats. Flamengo maybe the end of an era for the project side as they are relegated. Zagreb , Swansea , Galatasaray must also be disappointed with their seasons. Again I have the feeling that a number of sides feel more able to take risks and clearly rebuilds are in progress.
| GK | DEF | MID | ATT | Top18 | Ave | ETOT | Pre | Fin | VA | PVA | |
| Celta Vigo | 88.0 | 87.5 | 88.2 | 89.0 | 86.0 | 87.7 | 219.29 | 16 | 2 | 14 | 7.50 |
| Fenerbahçe SK | 92.0 | 87.8 | 89.0 | 89.0 | 86.0 | 87.9 | 220.61 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 2.67 |
| Celtic | 89.0 | 88.0 | 88.0 | 89.0 | 85.0 | 87.5 | 219.53 | 15 | 7 | 8 | 1.29 |
| Levante UD | 90.0 | 91.3 | 90.2 | 91.0 | 86.0 | 89.6 | 225.43 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1.00 |
| Sampdoria | 87.0 | 88.3 | 87.8 | 88.0 | 85.0 | 87.3 | 218.68 | 19 | 12 | 7 | 0.67 |
| Borussia Mönchengladbach | 87.0 | 88.5 | 88.2 | 90.0 | 86.0 | 88.2 | 220.62 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 0.67 |
| FC Twente | 88.0 | 87.5 | 88.4 | 88.0 | 87.0 | 87.7 | 218.92 | 18 | 13 | 5 | 0.46 |
| West Ham United | 89.0 | 87.8 | 88.0 | 90.0 | 86.0 | 87.9 | 220.10 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 0.44 |
| Cruzeiro | 89.0 | 87.5 | 89.0 | 89.0 | 85.0 | 87.6 | 219.93 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 0.40 |
| AS Roma | 88.0 | 86.8 | 87.0 | 87.0 | 85.0 | 86.4 | 216.31 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 0.05 |
| Sunderland | 88.0 | 89.5 | 89.4 | 90.0 | 87.0 | 89.0 | 222.62 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 0.00 |
| VfL Wolfsburg | 88.0 | 86.8 | 88.6 | 90.0 | 86.0 | 87.8 | 219.66 | 14 | 15 | -1 | 0.00 |
| AS Monaco | 87.0 | 87.8 | 87.8 | 89.0 | 86.0 | 87.6 | 219.05 | 17 | 19 | -2 | -0.05 |
| Internazionale | 88.0 | 89.3 | 90.0 | 91.0 | 87.0 | 89.3 | 223.55 | 2 | 4 | -2 | -0.25 |
| Galatasaray SK | 88.0 | 87.8 | 89.0 | 89.0 | 86.0 | 87.9 | 220.13 | 11 | 16 | -5 | -0.25 |
| Swansea City | 88.0 | 88.0 | 88.6 | 91.0 | 87.0 | 88.7 | 221.43 | 7 | 14 | -7 | -0.43 |
| Dinamo Zagreb | 89.0 | 89.0 | 89.6 | 89.0 | 86.0 | 88.4 | 221.73 | 5 | 11 | -6 | -0.45 |
| Flamengo | 86.0 | 89.8 | 89.4 | 88.0 | 86.0 | 88.3 | 221.16 | 8 | 17 | -9 | -0.47 |
| FC Schalke 04 | 90.0 | 89.3 | 90.2 | 90.0 | 86.0 | 88.9 | 223.18 | 3 | 8 | -5 | -0.50 |
| FC AUGSBURG | 89.0 | 88.8 | 88.8 | 90.0 | 86.0 | 88.4 | 221.54 | 6 | 18 | -12 | -0.61 |